Opinion: Time For Everyone to Retire the I-Word

Immigration Reform Sign on 4th Street
Hugo Balta
Special to CTLatinoNews.com

Human beings are legal. Actions are illegal. Despite this clear distinction, the term “illegal immigrant” is frequently used in the ongoing debate on immigration reform. However, the time has come to retire this offensive term as we advance as a society.
Not only is it grammatically incorrect, it is also dehumanizing. The “I-word”, as many Latinos call it, has a direct impact on the lives of the 11 million people it refers to – those living in the United States who do not have the proper documentation.
It attempts to discredit this group of people and question their motives for being in this country, as well as instill fear in order to silence their voices.
Fatma Marouf, co-director of the Immigration Clinic at the University of Nevada Boyd School of Law, is among the critics of the term. She argues that the term ‘illegal immigrants’ erroneously suggests that anyone in the United States without legal status is a criminal. Unlawful presence in the United States does not make the person a criminal. She goes on to add, we don’t call people who cheat on their taxes illegal taxpayers, do we?
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Jose Antonio Vargas, who describes himself as undocumented, calls the term offensive and inaccurate because it criminalizes people rather than their actions.
The I-word intentionally creates an image of criminals lurking in the shadows of our communities, undermining the fact that most immigrants who do not have documentation are hard-working mothers, fathers, sons and daughters whose only “crime” is trying to achieve a better life for themselves and their families.
My family is among them. I am the proud son of immigrants. My parents, who at an age where many young adults today are just concerned about the next party or plans for spring break, made a life-changing decision.
My mother was 18 years old and my father was 21 when they came to the United States. They didn’t speak English. They didn’t know the customs or the culture. They were scared and desperate. But, my mother worked several jobs, including one in a factory, where in the summer there was no air conditioning and poor heating in the winter. My father worked several jobs, too. His work days began at two in the morning and ended at 10 at night.
Of course, their story is not unique. Perhaps that is why many have underestimated the passion immigration reform stirs up. To try and win last year’s presidential election, the Republican Party thought Latino citizens would not be impacted by their vitriolic attacks on those living here without permission. Candidate Mitt Romney used the phrase “undocumented illegals” when describing his “self-deportation” policy. As history now illustrates, he and his advisors failed to understand that while Latino voters may not be directly affected by deportation, their friends and families are. With their vote, they spoke for a community that conservatives tried to demonize.
No organization wants to be the next Republican Party. So, it was no surprise when the Associated Press announced earlier this month that it will no longer use the term “illegal immigrant.” It will make the change in the AP Stylebook, a style and usage guide used by the news industry.
This is a prudent about-face decision. Right before the November election, Tom Kent, the AP’s deputy managing editor for standards and production, argued for the use of illegal immigrant because “…such people are here in violation of the law. It’s simply a legal reality.”
USA Today has followed the AP’s lead in dropping the derogatory term. Other media outlets like the New York Times say they’re also considering making changes to their stylebook guidelines. Really? What mind-twisting debate is there to be had?
There is no room for hesitation or procrastination when it comes to doing the right thing. The National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ) condemns the use of the term “illegal immigrants,” “illegal aliens” and “illegals”.
Those demeaning titles must be seen for what they are: propaganda tools used to blame a group of vulnerable people for the social and economic ills that plague a nation. Our media must lead the way in discarding yet another vestige of hate.
Hugo Balta is the President of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and a Senior Producer at ESPN. He lives in West Hartford. 
(Photo by  pamhule)

Related

2 thoughts on “Opinion: Time For Everyone to Retire the I-Word

  1. Thank you CT Latino News for starting the conversation on this. I share the sentiments that the word illegal validates the sterotypes associated with Latinos. I often have conversations and when I speak of the Latinos I know, please are surprised that smart, hardworking Latinos exist. The reality is that we do and like all races and cultures there are people who mess up along the way but PLEASE know that immigrating to a country tin seek of a better life is not a criminal act. I refuse to let those of us that have used the immigration ladder to get to better life kick the ladder off to stay comfortable.
    People after every immigration wave THE UNITED STATES was propelled into a period of prosperity and an advacement in civil rights.
    To SAVE AMERICA we need immigration reform. To save HUMANITY we need you to remember “before you were you, YOU were immigrants”

  2. The term ‘illegal immigrant’ should be changed to ‘criminal invader’.We have laws against coming into this country illegally that have never been enforced resulting in 11 million or so criminal invaders.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *